NOTICE OF REFERENDUM ELECTION
APRIL 4, 2023
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that at an election to be held in the several towns, villages, wards, and election districts of the State of Wisconsin, on Tuesday, April 4, 2023, the following questions will be submitted to a vote of the people pursuant to law:
2023 ENROLLED JOINT RESOLUTION 2
To amend section 8 (2) of article I of the constitution; relating to: conditions for release prior to
conviction, including the imposition of bail (second consideration). Whereas, the 2021 legislature in regular session considered a proposed amendment to the constitution in 2021 Assembly Joint
Resolution 107, which became 2021 Enrolled Joint Resolution 6, and agreed to it by a majority of the members elected to each of the two houses, which proposed amendment reads as follows:
SECTION 1. Section 8 (2) of article I of the constitution is amended to read:
[ Article I] Section 8 (2) All persons, before conviction, shall be eligible for release under reasonable conditions designed to assure their appearance in court, protect members of the community from serious bodily harm as defined by the legislature by law, or prevent the intimidation of witnesses. Monetary conditions of release may be imposed at or after the initial appearance only upon a finding that there is a reasonable basis to believe that the conditions are necessary to assure appearance in court, or if the person is accused of a violent crime as defined by the legislature by law, only upon a finding that there is a reasonable basis to believe that the conditions are necessary based on the totality of the circumstances, taking into account whether the accused has a previous conviction for a violent crime as defined by the legislature by law, the probability that the accused will fail to appear in court, the need to protect members of the community from serious harm as defined by the legislature by law, the need to prevent the intimidation of witnesses. and the potential affirmative defenses of the accused. The legislature may authorize, by law, courts to revoke a person’s release for
-2-
a violation of a condition of release.
Now, therefore, be it resolved by the senate, the assembly concurring, That the foregoing proposed amendment to the constitution is agreed to by the 2023 legislature; and, be it further Resolved, That the foregoing proposed amendment to the constitution be submitted to a vote of the people at the election to be held on the first Tuesday of April, 2023; and, be it further Resolved, That the question concerning ratification of the foregoing proposed amendment to the constitution be stated on the ballot as follows: QUESTION 1: “Conditions of release before conviction. Shall section 8 (2) of article I of the constitution be amended to allow a court
to impose on an accused person being released before conviction conditions that are designed to protect the community from serious harm?” QUESTION 2: “Cash bail before conviction. Shall section 8 (2) of article I of the constitution be amended to allow a court to impose cash bail on a person accused of a violent crime based on the totality of the circumstances, including the accused’s previous convictions for a violent crime, the probability that the accused will fail to appear, the need to protect the community from serious harm and prevent witness intimidation, and potential affinitive defenses?”
EXPLANATION
1. Explanatory statement regarding Question 1:
Under the current Wisconsin Constitution, courts
may impose reasonable conditions on the release of a
criminal defendant before trial for three purposes: (1) to
secure the defendant’s appearance in court; (2) to
protect the community from “serious bodily harm;” and
(3) to prevent intimidation of witnesses. Wis. Const. art.
I, § 8(2).
Question 1 would change the language of the second
factor from “serious bodily harm” to “serious harm as
defined by the legislature by law.” The question would
thus change the type of harm to the community that a
court could seek to protect against. Because the term
“serious harm” would be defined by the legislature by
-3-
law, what it means could evolve over time depending on
legislative enactments.
A “yes” vote on Question 1 would vote to amend
Wis. Const. art. I, § 8(2) to allow a circuit court to
impose release conditions based on the purpose of
avoiding “serious harm as defined by the legislature”
rather than “serious bodily harm.”
A “no” vote on Question 1 would vote not to amend
Wis. Const. art. I, § 8(2) to change the term “serious
bodily harm” as a factor for determining the conditions
of a defendant’s pretrial release.
2. Explanatory statement regarding Question 2:
Question 2 would also change the language of Wis.
Const. art. I, § 8(2), but in a different way from Question
1. Question 2 addresses the circuit court’s ability to
impose the specific condition of monetary bail.
Currently, the Wisconsin Constitution allows a
court to impose a monetary bail requirement only if the
court finds a reasonable basis to believe that bail is
necessary in order to secure the defendant’s appearance
in court. Wis. Const. art. I, § 8(2).
Question 2 would expand the factors a circuit court
may consider in imposing monetary bail. In cases where
a defendant is accused of a “violent crime as defined by
the legislature by law,” Question 2 would allow a court
to impose monetary bail based on circumstances in
addition to securing the defendant’s appearance in
court, including accounting for a previous conviction for
a violent crime, the need to protect the community from
-4-
serious harm, preventing witness intimidation, and
potential affirmative defenses the defendant might
assert.
A “yes” vote on Question 2 would vote to amend
Wis. Const. art. I, § 8(2) in cases where the defendant is
accused of a violent crime to allow a court to utilize
monetary bail for additional reasons in addition to
securing the defendant’s appearance in court, including
accounting for a previous conviction for a violent crime,
the need to protect the community from serious harm,
preventing witness intimidation, and accounting for the
defendant’s affirmative defenses. Because the term
“violent crime” would be defined by the legislature by
law, what it means could evolve over time depending on
legislative enactments.
A “no” vote on Question 2 would vote not to amend
Wis. Const. art. I, § 8(2) to expand the factors a court
considers in imposing monetary bail.
2023 ENROLLED JOINT RESOLUTION
Relating to: providing for an advisory referendum on the question of requiring able-bodied, childless adults to look for work in order to receive taxpayer-funded welfare benefits.
Resolved by the senate, the assembly concurring, That the following question be submitted, for advisory purposes only, to the voters of this state at the spring election to be held in April 2023: “Shall able-bodied, childless adults be required to look for work in order to receive taxpayer-funded welfare benefits?”
EXPLANATION
Explanatory statement regarding Question 3, the
advisory question:
-5-
This is an advisory referendum and would not
change Wisconsin law. Wisconsin and federal law
currently define various programs available to those
with financial need based on criteria such as age,
familial status, and disability, among other criteria.
Most of those programs are limited to children, families
with children, pregnant women, disabled persons, or
those 65 or older, who Wisconsin law does not consider
“able-bodied” for public assistance purposes. See, e.g.,
Wis. Stat. § 49.79(1)(am) (defining age limits for “ablebodied” under food stamp program).
Two programs currently available to “able-bodied,
childless adults” are Wisconsin’s BadgerCare Plus
medical assistance program and the FoodShare
program, also known as SNAP or food stamps. However,
those programs are subject to certain federal
requirements and restrictions that either would be
inconsistent with the requirement about which the
referendum asks or, in some cases, already include such
a requirement.
BadgerCare Plus’s medical assistance program is
subject to federal Medicaid restrictions, and federal law
does not allow for work-based requirements for such
programs absent a federal waiver. See 42 U.S.C. §
1396a(a)(10)(A). Currently, there is no federal waiver in
force that would allow Wisconsin to impose work
requirements on this program. Wisconsin’s FoodShare
statute contains requirements that able-bodied,
childless adults be employed or participate in an
employment and training program, see Wis. Stat. §
49.79(9), but that requirement has been suspended by
-6-
the federal government in response to the COVID-19
pandemic.
A “yes” vote on Question 3, the advisory
referendum, would make no change to Wisconsin law.
A “no” vote on Question 3, the advisory referendum,
also would make no change to Wisconsin law.
DONE in the County of Barron,
this 29th day of March,2023.
____________________________
Lisa Blechinger, Clerk Town of Bear Lake
Posted 4-2-2023